<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celtics Finally Make a Move: Add Von Wafer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.celtics247.com/2010/07/celtics-finally-make-a-move-add-von-wafer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.celtics247.com/2010/07/celtics-finally-make-a-move-add-von-wafer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:59:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin Chapman</title>
		<link>http://www.celtics247.com/2010/07/celtics-finally-make-a-move-add-von-wafer/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celtics247.com/?p=1111#comment-363</guid>
		<description>I like Wafer. He can shoot the ball, finish at the rim, he plays with good energy and he hit a lot of big shots for Houston down the stretch of games. I like like hit fit here, and how what he brings can benefit Quis. Nate can bring the ball up, Wafer can spread the floor, and Quis can relegate to his true strength as a scorer (go to work via triple-threat off the catch at 10-12 feet). If the defense collapses, Quis is smart enough to make the right play and kick it back out to an open shooter. If they go 1-on-1, Quis will probably get a good (yet awkward) pull-up shot off the bounce in the paint.

I like the lineups we can use. You can put Quis with Paul, Ray or Wafer. You can play Wafer with Paul or Quis, and even Ray at times against some of the smaller wing rotations. And they all bring something different. Doc has options, and he can play around with rotations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Wafer. He can shoot the ball, finish at the rim, he plays with good energy and he hit a lot of big shots for Houston down the stretch of games. I like like hit fit here, and how what he brings can benefit Quis. Nate can bring the ball up, Wafer can spread the floor, and Quis can relegate to his true strength as a scorer (go to work via triple-threat off the catch at 10-12 feet). If the defense collapses, Quis is smart enough to make the right play and kick it back out to an open shooter. If they go 1-on-1, Quis will probably get a good (yet awkward) pull-up shot off the bounce in the paint.</p>
<p>I like the lineups we can use. You can put Quis with Paul, Ray or Wafer. You can play Wafer with Paul or Quis, and even Ray at times against some of the smaller wing rotations. And they all bring something different. Doc has options, and he can play around with rotations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://www.celtics247.com/2010/07/celtics-finally-make-a-move-add-von-wafer/comment-page-1/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celtics247.com/?p=1111#comment-357</guid>
		<description>I would rather have McCants. They both got baggage but McCants has more potential</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would rather have McCants. They both got baggage but McCants has more potential</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.celtics247.com/2010/07/celtics-finally-make-a-move-add-von-wafer/comment-page-1/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celtics247.com/?p=1111#comment-355</guid>
		<description>We need something or someone to trade to the Blazers to get Rudy. Seeing as how the Celtics signed him for the minimum deal, maybe it was to get trading power? Time will tell! I really want Rudy for power off the bench!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need something or someone to trade to the Blazers to get Rudy. Seeing as how the Celtics signed him for the minimum deal, maybe it was to get trading power? Time will tell! I really want Rudy for power off the bench!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo B</title>
		<link>http://www.celtics247.com/2010/07/celtics-finally-make-a-move-add-von-wafer/comment-page-1/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celtics247.com/?p=1111#comment-354</guid>
		<description>Are you kidding me ?  Not a great vote of confidence for Danny on this one.  Go get some players</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding me ?  Not a great vote of confidence for Danny on this one.  Go get some players</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.celtics247.com/2010/07/celtics-finally-make-a-move-add-von-wafer/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celtics247.com/?p=1111#comment-353</guid>
		<description>Well the more I research Wafer, the more I like him, but yeah I definitely still want Rudy. I just don&#039;t see Rudy, Wafer, and Marquis all getting minutes. Not to mention fitting in Avery somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the more I research Wafer, the more I like him, but yeah I definitely still want Rudy. I just don&#8217;t see Rudy, Wafer, and Marquis all getting minutes. Not to mention fitting in Avery somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.celtics247.com/2010/07/celtics-finally-make-a-move-add-von-wafer/comment-page-1/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celtics247.com/?p=1111#comment-352</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind Wafer, but I still want Rudy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind Wafer, but I still want Rudy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.celtics247.com/2010/07/celtics-finally-make-a-move-add-von-wafer/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celtics247.com/?p=1111#comment-351</guid>
		<description>Im hoping Rudy isn&#039;t off. I guess they are completely different players so maybe we still see a trade soon for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im hoping Rudy isn&#8217;t off. I guess they are completely different players so maybe we still see a trade soon for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dreik</title>
		<link>http://www.celtics247.com/2010/07/celtics-finally-make-a-move-add-von-wafer/comment-page-1/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>dreik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celtics247.com/?p=1111#comment-350</guid>
		<description>I don’t get why Rudy is off the table??? We still need another wing. Jesus the C’s r gonna suck next year. These bench is lookin pretty hideous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t get why Rudy is off the table??? We still need another wing. Jesus the C’s r gonna suck next year. These bench is lookin pretty hideous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.celtics247.com/2010/07/celtics-finally-make-a-move-add-von-wafer/comment-page-1/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celtics247.com/?p=1111#comment-348</guid>
		<description>wafer was huge in houston. can defend much better than fernandez too. i only ever wanted fernandez because i hoped we&#039;d get pryzbilla in the trade with him, but realistically i dont think that would have happened anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wafer was huge in houston. can defend much better than fernandez too. i only ever wanted fernandez because i hoped we&#8217;d get pryzbilla in the trade with him, but realistically i dont think that would have happened anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.celtics247.com/2010/07/celtics-finally-make-a-move-add-von-wafer/comment-page-1/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celtics247.com/?p=1111#comment-347</guid>
		<description>So what does this mean for Rudy Fernandez I wonder? I hope this doesn&#039;t eliminate the chance of us getting him. Wafer does nothing for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what does this mean for Rudy Fernandez I wonder? I hope this doesn&#8217;t eliminate the chance of us getting him. Wafer does nothing for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

